Even as the wobbling wheels of the Covid hoax begin to detach themselves, the Marxists continue to double, triple and quadruple-down on their glaringly false narratives. There may be no better example than an opinion piece entitled “Anti-vax legislation puts South Carolinians in danger.”
This astoundingly ludicrous work of fiction appeared recently on a website belonging to “The States Newsroom,” a Marxist organization that even Wikipedia describes as “left-leaning.” That’s an admission that tells us it’s an organization that is probably to the the left of Mao.
Since the stated purpose of this space is primarily about exposing lies, I’d say that this masterpiece practically leapt off my screen when it popped up on a personalized, keyword-based news feed that I check every morning.
Reading through this work of fantasy penned by someone called Paul Hyde is a bit of a chore since it is so jam-packed with utter falsehoods and propaganda. It appears to be a rather pathetic attempt to keep Covid panic alive and kicking, but what the author may not realize is that he is preaching only to the choir at this point.
People have awakened to the Covid scam and that is convincingly demonstrated by the massive reduction in the number of people seeking so-called “boosters” and other Covid-related jabs that the profiteers from Big Pharma are brewing up these days. I hope the author has dutifully lined up for his 9th jab at this point.
That’s not to say that there does not exist a devoted cult of Covidians that are still lapping up every word that the corrupt CDC and their ilk are still spewing like raw sewage about the seemingly endless dangers of Covid-19. I see them in stores regularly with their little obedience masks affixed firmly to their worried faces. Fortunately, they are now a very small minority, making them look all the more ridiculous among the people that choose to carry on more like normal humans would be expected to. This is exactly what the Marxist Covid Cultists do not want to see. In order to succeed, they need people living in fear of something, and apparently they are not ready to let go of the Covid fraud just yet.
The article in question hits kind of close to home because I live in South Carolina. I am not a life-long resident of the state or even a life-long resident of the south. I’m a “Yankee” who grew up in Massachusetts. A state now so deeply in the clutches of Marxists that it is barely recognizable as a part of the United States of America. A condition particularly shameful considering that was where it all began. I grew up not too far from Lexington and Concord and still have friends and relatives there that keep me informed about the sickening developments that are gradually turning the place into something that more resembles a province of Communist China than a U.S. state.
After moving to the south some dozen years ago, we settled in North Carolina and remained there for about 10 years. The same state that give birth to “The Hopewell Fund,” which is the Marxist organization that created “The States Newsroom.” North Carolina was once a pretty solid red state, but like too many others, the Marxists have been chipping away at it and gradually turning it more purple in recent years. The Hopewell Fund was doubtlessly happy to contribute to that effort. They are probably unaware that their Marxist goals for this country, if they are ever realized, will lead to their end as well. Just as it does for all “useful idiots” that have perished at the hands of their Communist overlords throughout history.
I am unable to make the claim that I moved to South Carolina because it was a more solidly-red state. I also make no claim that I fled the crumbling northeast to take refuge in the more conservative south, but I will say that for me it was a nice additional benefit and added some incentive. When we moved to North Carolina it was mostly because we all felt like we needed a change. The kids were still living with us at the time and they were all for it so we did it. When my wife and I moved to South Carolina about two years ago we did it mainly because we could get more house for our money here and we would still be close to our kids. Again, being a more red state was a very welcome benefit for me and only added to my desire to settle here.
I recall working with a real estate agent in North Carolina who was showing us homes there at the time since we wanted to at least give remaining in North Carolina a chance. One day after touring a house with her we got to chatting about Covid, which was in full bloom at the time. She expressed some degree of horror over having recently traveled to a town in South Carolina and seeing that fewer residents were wearing face masks. Although I was tempted, I did not get into it with her over that and just let it slide for the sake of the business relationship and not making my wife uncomfortable. But it surely nudged me a good bit towards believing South Carolina was indeed the place where we should be looking for a new home.
My experience here in South Carolina so far has pretty well matched my expectations. Unlike where we lived in North Carolina, instead of a hard core Leftist as our nearest neighbor, we now live closest to a younger couple who are solid conservatives. It is indeed a more reliably red state and that’s probably why I find it so disgusting to discover a work of fiction like the one I am about to dissect.
The author of “Anti-vax legislation puts South Carolinians in danger” begins with the ridiculous claim that “One of the most dangerous places you could be during the pandemic was in South Carolina.” He claims that South Carolina had the 10th highest death rate from Covid-19 during 2021. Beyond the fact that his source for that statistic is the utterly corrupt CDC, which has lied to the public prolifically since the “pandemic” was declared, we also know there was massive fraud regarding the reporting of deaths that were listed as being the result of Covid-19. Hospitals were profiting from government payments made to them for treating Covid patients. Even Marxist media mouthpiece USA Today admits that. Is it possible that in some dark corners of our corrupt medical-industrial complex there were some “exaggerations” going on with regard to patients that actually had Covid and those who did not? It is hard to believe it did not considering that profit is now the primary goal of our medical establishment.
And speaking of patients that had Covid and those that did not, was it even possible to not have Covid when using PCR tests that were cranked up to the extraordinarily sensitive cycle threshold level of 40 or 45? I suppose a hospital would not technically be guilty of fraud if a test sanctioned by government agencies indicated that a patient had Covid.
The inventor of the PCR test, the late Kary Mullis himself, stated that the test, depending on the cycle threshold used, could “find anything in anybody” because it can literally detect a single molecule of a virus. Our red star-wearing friends at USA Today did their best to “debunk” that with a “fact check” (when you see that you know the lies are about to be turned up to 11) but failed miserably with their claim that it was “taken out of context”.” It is clear from the video of Mullis making that statement that he is indeed talking about finding anything in anybody, not just HIV patients. His comments following that statement make it very clear. Anyone with any capacity to understand English will see that is exactly what he meant. The comment regarding a single molecule should clear that up with no lingering doubts.
Mr. Hyde, ever clutching his pearls, states that South Carolina’s low vaccination rate was one reason for declaring that our state was “one of the most dangerous places you could be.” And again his dramatic claims fall flat when the facts are revealed. Let us delve into how “safe and effective” those “vaccines” actually are, shall we?
It’s interesting, but not at all surprising, that the claims from the usual government agencies and the rest of their Big Pharma lap dogs regarding the efficacy of the Covid-19 “vaccines” has been somewhat, shall we say, flexible, over time. I’m sure most of us can recall the bold and reassuring claims from “experts” like Anthony Fauci and then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky that if you get the “vaccine,” you would not get Covid. Period. End of discussion. The experts had spoken.
I think I’ve lost count of how many “vaccinated” people on social media have posted about how they have Covid (some of them multiple times) but were “fully vaccinated” and “boosted.” Adding to the comic value of those posts, they almost always would add they they were grateful to be “vaccinated” and “boosted” and that their illness would have been worse without that supposed benefit. In reality, they probably stood a much better chance of not being infected at all if the jabs had not damaged their immune system as they are known to do.
Now, let’s entertain ourselves further with some data regarding the efficacy of the Covid-19 “vaccines.” A recently-released and scholarly-sounding study, complete with a host of names that feature impressive titles such as M.D. and Ph.D. concluded that the “vaccine” was 54 percent effective against infection and 49.4 percent effective against symptomatic Covid-19. Not having the benefit of an M.D. or Ph.D. myself, I cannot tell you what the difference is between those two scenarios but I can tell you that both of those numbers fall far short of the efficacy that was so boldly proclaimed just a couple of years ago.
As we can see from this previous claim, that comes directly from Big Pharma (and we know we can trust them completely!), the Covid-19 “vaccine” was stated to be 95 percent effective. Now would be the time to cue the laugh track if this platform offered that option. I dare say that a fall from grace that spans a range of 41 percentage points is quite a decline. And that’s giving the scholarly study the benefit of the doubt, which I am hesitant to do (check the “Conflict of interest” section). When Big Pharma-influenced shills like the authors of this study will admit to it being so much less effective that originally advertised you know the actual numbers must be even worse. I believe the “vaccines” are 0 percent effective against anything other than the litany of health problems they are known to cause for many people.
So much for the lack of “vaccination” here in South Carolina being attributable to how “dangerous” a place it was to be during the “pandemic.” We have seen the “experts” and “officials” gradually walk back their claims of “vaccine” efficacy for the past couple of years or so. The bottom line is that they do not work, never have worked and probably never will work. In very similar fashion to how all previous attempts to develop a vaccine for a corona virus have failed spectacularly and had only a pile of dead lab animals to show for their efforts. Oops. (Don’t tell PETA)
Regarding the numbers of deaths that actually resulted from Covid-19, we readily see that there are a host of problems with those numbers. Specifically for South Carolina and other red states, we can see from the CDC data linked in the article that their numbers are generally higher than for blue states. Why would that be? Mr. Hyde wants us to believe it is because people in red states were less likely to get “vaccinated,” honor “social distance” guidelines and wear masks. More likely, however, it was because the corrupt CDC, under the control of what may be the most corrupt administration in American history, fudged the data to make it appear that those non-compliant rednecks in rebellious red states made things worse for themselves and everyone else. The current administration and most of the agencies under its control do little else but lie. About everything. That makes it very hard to have any confidence in their data.
Let me take a moment to address another obvious flaw in reasoning that the Covid Cult has been pushing since the beginning. They claimed that the vaccines were “safe and effective.” At the same time they chastised those who refused the jabs and said they should be excluded from society or even placed in quarantine camps. Here’s the obvious question: If you chose to get “vaccinated,” were you not protected from Covid-19? What would it matter if others got vaccinated as long as you were “protected?” Make it make sense.
But it actually does make sense. Marxists are all about imposing their will on others. That’s a key foundational principle of the original doctrine that Karl Marx formulated all those years ago. While they may be free to do what they please in a free society like ours, they are never satisfied unless others are forced to go along with what they believe everyone else should be doing. They are the hall monitors of our society and they are always watching. I think it’s fair to say that it is really some kind of mental illness.
Mr. Hyde takes South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster to task for resisting calls to impose unnecessary restrictions on citizens such as ”vaccine” mandates, mask mandates and vaccine passports to access public services and facilities. Although many of us knew at the time that those ridiculous measures did not significantly influence the spread of Covid-19, evidence has since emerged that has “experts” and “officials” back-peddling yet again.
He also blames McMaster for alleged harm caused by his very sensible decision to reopen South Carolina earlier than many other states. He claims that Covid-19 cases “soared.” Knowing what we now know about how cases were determined using unrealistically-sensitive PCR testing methods it is difficult to have confidence in any of the reports regarding the number of cases at any given time.
Clearly Mr. Hyde is dissatisfied with the reported 60 percent (71 percent if you count those who received only a single jab) of South Carolinians that made the fateful decision to get “vaccinated.” Only 100 percent compliance is acceptable to a true Marxist. Anyone who resists should be sent immediately to a re-education camp, gulag or death row.
Personally, I’m happy to be living in a state where more residents demonstrated the good sense to refuse those dangerous and ineffective shots. In blue states like my old home state of Massachusetts, it is reported that up to 95 percent of residents opted to inject themselves with Big Pharma’s magic potion and in New York, the numbers were about the same. In California, 85 percent of residents subjected themselves to at least one jab.
The issue that really has Mr. Hyde’s panties in a bunch is the proposal of legislation in South Carolina that would prevent businesses from restricting access to their properties on the basis of vaccination status. He hilariously refers to the proposed legislation as “jaw-droppingly irresponsible.” What’s actually jaw-dropping is how quickly good comrades like Mr. Hyde are to so easily surrender essential freedoms so that he and other Nervous Nellies can feel “safe.”
The legislative proposal would also reportedly not allow the state to to buy, store, distribute and/or administer emergency-approved vaccines in a public health crisis. Given how the last “pandemic” turned out and how many people were harmed by the poison jabs, this proposal does not sound unreasonable. In fact, this portion of the proposal is not so much a ban and more of a sensible precautionary measure since it applies only to vaccines that have not been fully approved by the FDA. Considering what has been happening since the introduction of the failed Covid-19 “vaccines” that were rushed through approval with “emergency authorization,” this seems like a very sensible proposal. The population should not be subject to inadequately-tested, rushed and dangerous “emergency” treatments.
Mr. Hyde then goes in to parrot the usual and expected propaganda regarding how “safe and effective” the Covid-19 “vaccines” are and how many lives they supposedly saved. Both hilariously laughable claims that are proving themselves more with each new revelation regarding just how dangerous and ineffective they are and how they have likely resulted in far more life lost than saved. Perhaps Mr. Hyde did not catch Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent 4-hour hearing that featured numerous medical and scientific professionals who dared to tell the truth about the dangerous Covid-19 “vaccinations.”
Unfortunately for people like Mr. Hyde, it cannot be said that Sen. Johnson’s hearing was a right-wing dog and pony show. Instead, a number of the professionals sounding the alarm over the dangerous injections are liberals (I do not call them Marxists because they are “old school” liberals that have not embraced the current extreme leftist agenda.) They, unlike so many others, have demonstrated the integrity and compassion for their fellow human beings that seems to be required in order to state the truth about the safety and efficacy of a treatment that has caused the death of thousands and will likely cause the deaths of many more.
It’s not often that we witness praise lavished upon Donald Trump by a reliable comrade like Paul Hyde but in this case we see exactly that. He praises Trump for “Operation Warp Speed,” calling it “one of the former president’s finest accomplishments.” I disagree to say the least.
Although I consider myself a Trump supporter, the biggest disappointment I had with his term was the decision to put that whole “Warp Speed” disaster in motion. As far as I know, he continues defending that fiasco and that will probably be one thing I will continue to disagree with him about.
In all my years observing the goings-on in this country I do not think I have ever identified a political candidate that I considered to be “perfect” and Trump is no exception. Even so, he’s clearly a superior choice when compared to the disastrous presidency of the current dementia patient that everyone is calling “president.” Anyone who cannot see that we were all far better off during Trump’s term is simply denying reality.
Towards the beginning of the article Mr. Hyde states the following: “We placed an individual’s supposed right-to-infect above public health.” I have to presume that by “right-to-infect,” he is talking about going about one’s business in a normal manner without submitting to the “vaccination” and without the useless face masks. To that I would reply that there are no exceptions in our founding documents that state that our freedom can be curtailed for the sake of safety. In fact, Benjamin Franklin is famously known for the following quote: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
When we consider the glaringly obvious corruption at the top levels of government, the idea of giving up any of our freedoms to their demands is even more ludicrous. Some of us understand why government seeks ever more control of the people and more restrictions in order to achieve that goal. Mr. Hyde is clearly not one of those people. If people like him want to hit the panic button every time “experts” and “officials” conjure up another boogie man, that is their right. They do not, however, have the right to restrict the freedoms that the rest of us cherish. There are lines that shall not be crossed and there are genuine patriots that are willing to do whatever needs to be done if those lines are indeed crossed.
For those who believe as Paul Hyde does, I have a suggestion. If you are afraid to venture out in public when our corrupt overlords decide to gin up another “pandemic” or other fake emergency, feel free to stay home and order everything you need online and have it delivered to your home. That surely would have been a valid option during the Covid-19 “pandemic” and I suspect it will be an option again unless a bona fide calamity comes our way. In that case, there will be no Door Dash, Amazon delivery or food available in local supermarkets. There also won’t be much hope of survival for the vast majority of the population.
People like Paul Hyde will definitely succeed in convincing the usual crowd of low-intellect voters who lack the capacity for critical thinking. Just like the chronically-terrified people we see still wearing masks in public, there are those that are only too willing to panic and surrender essential freedoms for the sake of avoiding the flu. Feel free to panic and do whatever it is you like as long as you do not infringe on my freedom. It is my right to go about my business in public no matter what illness I may be suffering from. But rest assured, if I am truly ill, the last thing I will feel like doing is driving out to do some shopping. I will be staying home because I feel sick and will not be out and about spreading illness to others.
The “asymptotic spread” scare was another fantasy cooked up by corrupt “experts” and “officials.” It was later proven to be just another lie. It’s really boils down to common sense if you think about it. If a virus that has infected someone is not causing them any symptoms or discomfort, it is almost a certainty that there is not a sufficient quantity of the virus present in their system for it to spread from them in quantities sufficient to infect others. Our bodies are remarkably efficient about telling us when we are sick enough to warrant remaining at home.
Now that we are solidly on the other side of the Covid-19 “pandemic,” many more people than before are awake to the corruption and evil that has been slowly encroaching on our society and our lives. I believe that there will be much more resistance to future measures likes vaccine mandates, masking, social distancing and “lock-downs” when the next “pandemic” is unleased on the global population. Paul Hyde and his ilk can shiver under their covers at home while the rest of us go about our business as usual. Myself and millions of others will not surrender our freedoms in the face of another fake pandemic. Count on it.
Mr. Hyde makes reference to the South Carolina state motto, which is “While I breathe I hope.” That phrase is on my license plate so that is at least one thing he states truthfully. With regard to that motto, I find that I also hope. I am hoping that people like him will decide to leave South Carolina and move to a state where the political climate and resulting policies would be a better match for people like him. Perhaps he can fill in the empty spot I left in Massachusetts and leave those of us who genuinely value freedom to live in peace here in South Carolina.